BC’s gas plan is a short-sighted pipe dream.
by David Suzuki
BC appears to be pinning its economic hopes on natural gas — much of it obtained by fracking. While the world should be turning from fossil fuels to cleaner energy and conservation, we’re poised to dig ourselves deeper into the climate-altering carbon hole.
Taking a cue from the liquidation-sale policies of the Alberta and federal governments, BC’s leaders want to get fossil fuels out of the ground, piped to the coast, liquefied and shipped to Asia or wherever they can find buyers, as quickly as possible. It’s a short-sighted plan based on outmoded thinking. In the long run, it’s not good for the economy or the environment.
Whether politicians believe fossil fuel supplies are endless or can only see as far as the next election, they’re selling out our future and leaving a shattered legacy for our kids and grandkids. To start, natural gas is not the clean-energy solution it’s touted to be.
Most of the money wouldn’t even stay in BC, as many gas companies are from other provinces and countries. As for jobs, natural gas extraction, transport and production create relatively few compared to almost every other economic sector.
Liquefying the gas for export, which requires enormous amounts of energy, isn’t the only source of greenhouse gases. Leaks — or what the industry refers to as “fugitive emissions” — during drilling, extraction and transport are also concerns. Although the BC Environment Ministry claims just .3 to .4 per cent of gas escapes into the atmosphere, independent studies say it’s likely many times that amount.
According to an article in Nature, scientists from the US National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and the University of Colorado in Boulder found leaks of methane — a greenhouse gas 20 times more potent than carbon dioxide — amounted to between four and nine per cent of total production at two gas fields in the US.
Even the economic benefits of the province’s LNG plans are suspect. Many analysts expect price corrections, and UK LNG expert Peter Hughes told the CBC the perceived windfall is “wishful thinking” because BC will have to compete with producers in places like Qatar, East Africa and Australia. Most of the money wouldn’t even stay in BC, as many gas companies are from other provinces and countries. As for jobs, natural gas extraction, transport and production create relatively few compared to almost every other economic sector — including tourism, science and technology, health care, education and small business.
On top of that, hydraulic fracturing or fracking — shooting water, sand and chemicals at high pressure into the ground to shatter shale and release natural gas — has many other environmental consequences. It requires massive amounts of water, contaminates drinking water, damages habitat and ecosystems — even causes small earthquakes!
As well as seeing natural gas as an economic panacea, some argue it could be a “bridging fuel” — something cleaner than oil or coal to use while we make the transition to renewable energy. But it’s a hazard-strewn bridge, and subsidizing and investing in natural gas extraction and infrastructure without any real commitment to wean us off oil, coal and gas will only keep us on the fossil fuel road and discourage investment in clean energy and conservation.
The industry also relies on taxpayers’ money to subsidize it, through tax and royalty credits, and to provide water, roads and the massive amounts of energy required to liquefy the gas, perhaps from a new Site C dam on the Peace River. And fugitive emissions from gas operations are exempt from the carbon tax. If we are really “bridging” to reduce fossil fuels, why are we subsidizing companies for their carbon costs?
It’s time to invest our money and human resources in long-term, innovative ideas that will create good, lasting jobs, and ensure that we and our children and grandchildren continue to enjoy healthy and prosperous lives and that our spectacular “supernatural” environment is protected. We have abundant renewable resources and opportunities to conserve energy and lead the way in developing clean energy. It’s time to move forward.
Written with contributions from David Suzuki Foundation Communications Manager Ian Hanington.
References
Pembina report
Natural gas emissions
Methane leaks — Nature article
Peter Hughes
The LNG jobs myth
Fracking has many consequences
Earthquakes
Clean gas
Bridging fuel
We have abundant renewable resources
About David Suzuki
David T Suzuki, PhD, Chair of the David Suzuki Foundation, is an award-winning scientist, environmentalist and broadcaster.
David has received consistently high acclaim for his 30 years of award-winning work in broadcasting, explaining the complexities of science in a compelling, easily understood way. He is well known to millions as the host of the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation's popular science television series, The Nature of Things. An internationally respected geneticist, David was a full Professor at the University of British Columbia in Vancouver from 1969 until his retirement in 2001. He is professor emeritus with UBC's Sustainable Development Research Institute. From 1969 to 1972 he was the recipient of the prestigious EWR Steacie Memorial Fellowship Award for the "Outstanding Canadian
Research Scientist Under the Age of 35".
For more insights from David Suzuki, please read Everything Under the Sun (Greystone Books/David Suzuki Foundation), by David Suzuki and Ian Hanington, now available in bookstores and online.
This article is reprinted with permission.
Website
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.