Health

Aug 012012
 

Private clinic pushing to permit extra-billing.

Schreck: Bill any amount to eligible patient for service covered by MSP is prohibited extra-billing.July 23, 2012: Higher universal costs will result from permitting extra-billing by medical practitioners, writes David Schreck in The Tyee. Schreck explains how extra-billing affects patients and their access to health care, countering arguments that spending private dollars to reach the front of the line is harmless by demonstrating the value of fee negotiations.

"If talk shows are any indication, discussion of Dr. Brian Day's challenge of the constitutionality of some provisions of the Medicare Protection Act can easily go off on many tangents. For the future of Medicare as we know it, it is important to focus the discussion on the central issue of extra-billing, which is prohibited under the act.

Extra-billing occurs when a physician bills a patient for a service that could be billed to the Medical Services Plan, whether or not MSP is billed. Sections 17-19 of the act define direct or extra-billing (synonymous terms). The term double billing is not defined in the act…"

For the complete article, please click here.

Aug 012012
 

Undermining the common good not funny.

Schreck: Cruel joke joins public good, profit motive; needs of society are not products to buy, sellJuly 30, 2012: Paul Buchheit reports for Nation of Change that privatization usually has poor payoffs for the general public, raising costs for consumers and reducing revenue streams for public coffers. He notes that privatization can only work in the context of strict regulation, but goes on to say that it rarely benefits the delivery of essential public services. Buchheit demonstrates that in the US, privatization has adversely affected education, health care, banking, prisons, military, water and other utilities.

"The privatization of public goods and services turns basic human needs into products to buy and sell. That's more than a joke; it's an insult, it's a perversion. It generally benefits only a privileged group of businesspeople and their companies while increasing inequality and undermining the common good.

Various studies have identified the 'benefits' of privatization as profitability and productivity, efficiency, wider share ownership and good investment returns. These are business benefits. More balanced studies consider the effects on average people, who have paid into a long-established societal support system for their schools and emergency services, water and transportation systems, and eventually health care and retirement benefits…"

For the complete article, please click here.

Aug 012012
 

Canada must help ensure efficient and equitable health care for all citizens across the country.

McBane: Medicare works: it is more cost-effective, efficient and equitable than market health care.HALIFAX, NS, July 26, 2012: Public health care advocates from across the country are paying close attention to the Council of the Federation meeting in Halifax. The Nova Scotia Citizen's Health Care Network, of which the Nova Scotia Government and General Employees Union (NSGEU/NUPGE) and the National Union of Public and General Employees (NUPGE) are major supporters, held a press conference and a series of public events to outline their vision to improve Canada's public health care system.

"Stephen Harper is the biggest threat to public health care we've ever encountered. It is imperative that he return to the "014 Health Accord negotiation table, or we risk losing our high-quality universal health care. Every generation has fought to ensure that we can all access the health services we need. Now is the time for all of us to come together once again to defend this great Canadian value," says Maude Barlow, National Chairperson of the Council of Canadians.

Continue reading »